Archive for The Great Gatsby

Scribe: 05.05.2009

Period 4

HOY ES EL CINCO DE MAYO! (:
Today we got our multiple choice exam that we took yesterday back. Then there were series of different conversations for a long time and all i could hear was everyone getting mad at Sean for making the due date for the research paper tomorrow. So basically everyone hates Sean right now. haha
Anyway, we got a practice exam that consisted of the most recent multiple choice questions. At the end of the passages, there are footnotes. READ THOSE FOOTNOTES CAREFULLY because there are questions on reading/analyzing/interpreting the footnotes.
In the packet of essays:
  • On page 2, there is a DBQ on recent issues; this one was on global warming
  • The “DBQ” is like a researched argument, which is what we did for this research paper!
  • There are 6 sources but you only need to use 3.
  • There are citations with each source and these are used to figure out the credibility of the source
  • Source B – scientific interests –> accuracy
  • Source C – “special buisness sections” indicate that the source was for business readers and is therefore pro-business
  • Sources D & E – from universities (Oxford and Cambridge) –> political and business interests; they have intellectual rigor and are against the “sacred cow”
  • “sacred cow” = anything that people believe to be “untouchable”. For example, they think that democracy is the best government and that capitalism is the best economic system.
  • universities question belief systems and they also have “sacred cows” – they revere the intellectual
  • “DBQ” = synthesis essay. You can use outside knowledge but you should try to support your argument with the sources given because it shows how well you can use the sources given and it shows how well you can argue your point

We then went over the multiple choice exam we took yesterday. Apparently E told Ms Austin that we can do two passages and go over them or do three if she wants to and she chose to do three. Anyway, it seems as if a lot of people did badly, hearing from the tables around me. But E says that the practice ones we have been taking are harder than the actual test so we have hope, YAY (:

That’s all for today. Work hard on the research paper (:
i couldnt find any funny cartoons =( but here they are:
-Colleen Cho!
Period 5

Notes on Gatsby’s Narrative Structure

One of the difficulties we’ve been having with really reading The Great Gatsby I think, stems from the complicated narrative structure. Let’s see if we can unpack it:

Essentially we are working with a story within a story. A fictional memoir, in a way. Nick is telling a story about one season a few years ago. A time when he learned about the darker side of human nature, how strong it can be, and how weak our dreams are in the face of such reality.

But it’s not that simple. Nick is not totally independent, nor totally involved. He has “secret” knowledge that he only relays to us later. In fact, he intentionally distorts the narrative in several places, and then claims to be so plain speaking and honest in others that we have a hard time piecing together fact, fiction, and (intentional) fantasy. It creates for us the readers a sense of the drift into incredulity and the violent snapping back into total belief that Nick himself experienced whenever he spoke with Gatsby. I’ve drawn a little schematic to illustrate part of our problem:

gatsbynarrativestructure.jpg

All we have access to is the innermost narrative. Each level acts as a filter on any that are within it. So Fitzgerald’s ideas are the hardest to tease out because they are buried in the story and Nick’s relation of events. Also you can see why Nick seems so ambiguous–he is living (in the story world) on two levels simultaneously. We have to read REALLY closely to tell if the detail is Nick the (ignorant) character or Nick the (seemingly) all-knowing (ie. omniscient). What makes matters worse is that Nick filters his own opinions through two years of seething and steaming. He really doesn’t like Tom… who would? He basically killed Gatsby and convinced Daisy it was a good thing.

Back to narrative: when we read sections of the text where characters are inebriated, is Nick trying to give us a exact picture of the incoherence of the party, his own cognitive incoherence, or is he just trying to relate events the best he can remember with no artistic changes? He also tries to soften the blow with the ever-present (omnipresent?) euphemism. that figure of speech where we choose the softer sounding word. His feelings for Jordan are always wrapped in this–he almost seems shy about how much he likes/liked her. She fascinated him, but in the end her lack of depth, her lack of caring disgusts him and he can’t lie to himself anymore.

In conclusion, when you identify the author’s purpose or opinion try to separate the layers of narration (the story we’re reading is the middle box). Sexism, may not sexism, it may be the character’s cynicism; racism may not be racism, it may be social commentary (on disturbing trends); and the Romanticism may be all in Nick’s head. The party in chapter three, although it is rude, clumsy, and altogether absurd, is described with elevated diction and sparkling detail–and not to mention riddled with euphemism.

Ask yourself which level of narration are we operating on.

Gatsby, Chapter 4

Well, as we move into chapter four we get a most definite shift in style, tone, and topic. Nick’s narrative voice changes and becomes more of a participant, less of a reporter. As Nick becomes more enmeshed into the narrative, it will become harder to distinguish his editorializing (but it’s there). And I would argue that chapter 4 begins the middle portion of the story, or Act II. Act I (chs. 1, 2, & 3) were all introductions to the lives of East and West Egg, a taste of Manhattan and the Valley of the Ashes. Act I is unified by garden scenes (including that tapestry of the Garden of Versailles that I commented on at length).

Chapter four is where we begin to see under the shiny surfaces, beneath the mysterious grandeur. It opens with gossip and a list of names. We probably don’t recognize any of the names any more, but they’re all names with illustrious New England pasts. Then on the drive to Manhattan we learn that Gatsby is a bizarre and inconsistent story-teller. Nick never seems to believe him. I especially like the image of the turbanned Gatsby leaking sawdust in the Bois de Boulogne hunting big game (If you don’t know about the Bois de Boulogne, check the notes on chapter 4). Gatsby does seem to be leaking sawdust everywhere. Maybe that’s why he doesn’t talk much.

In Manhattan we have the shadowy figure of Meyer Wolfsheim, with human molars for cuff links. He too is an odd character who insists on telling stories of his friends being gunned down. He also insists that Jordan is an honest golfer and Gatsby a man who would never steal anyone’s wife. Why does he feel compelled to say these things?

Then everything is turned inside out with Jordan’s relation of events. I like how she is initially portrayed as sitting very straight on a straight chair. Is that because she and everyone else is so damn crooked? The only thing straight is the furniture, as if that would give them backbone. We also learn of Daisy’s joyless marriage–which was her own impatient fault (but could she really have been happy with Gatsby? or Anyone, for that matter?).

But instead of disgusting Nick, everything only adds to the Romantic feeling (that’s a big R, not romantic), the appealing against the odds. So much so he puts the moves on Jordan. This chapter really exposes Nick as a narcissist and all too ready to suspend his very reasonable disbelief. I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t like to spend too much time with a whole flock of liars. Where do you turn when you really need something? Sounds pretty lonely to me. But maybe Fitzgerald assumes that we would be as caught up in the romance as Nick, who knows? Nick is even willing to aid in the adulterous liaison with Gatsby & his first cousin. Maybe he’s not so Middle West as we originally thought.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Gatsby, Chapter 3–Your turn (pt. 4)

Ok. Here’s the last one for you to comment on. If you’ve worked on the others, this one should be a little easier:

I looked around. Most of the remaining women were now having fights with men said to be their husbands. Even Jordan’s party, the quartet from East Egg, were rent asunder by dissension. One of the men was talking with curious intensity to a young actress, and his wife, after attempting to laugh at the situation in a dignified and indifferent way, broke down entirely and resorted to flank attacks—at intervals she appeared suddenly at his side like an angry diamond, and hissed: “You promised!” into his ear.The reluctance to go home was not confined to wayward men. The hall was at present occupied by two deplorably sober men and their highly indignant wives. The wives were sympathizing with each other in slightly raised voices.

“Whenever he sees I’m having a good time he wants to go home.”

“Never heard anything so selfish in my life.”

“We’re always the first ones to leave.”

“So are we.”

“Well, we’re almost the last to-night,” said one of the men sheepishly. “The orchestra left half an hour ago.”

In spite of the wives’ agreement that such malevolence was beyond credibility, the dispute ended in a short struggle, and both wives were lifted, kicking, into the night.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Gatsby Chapter 3, Your turn (pt. 3)

After Jordan is called away to speak with Gatsby in private Nick wanders alone for a few minutes. 

A clue for you here is the figure of speech called euphemism.  Euphemism is when we substitute a pleasant or polite word for a harsher, but truer, reality.  For example a “moron” might be described as “mentally deficient,” or some one who is spastic and out of control could be described as “over zealous.”

Here it is:

I was alone and it was almost two. For some time confused and intriguing sounds had issued from a long, many-windowed room which overhung the terrace. Eluding Jordan’s undergraduate, who was now engaged in an obstetrical conversation with two chorus girls, and who implored me to join him, I went inside.

The large room was full of people. One of the girls in yellow was playing the piano, and beside her stood a tall, red-haired young lady from a famous chorus, engaged in song. She had drunk a quantity of champagne, and during the course of her song she had decided, ineptly, that everything was very, very sad—she was not only singing, she was weeping too. Whenever there was a pause in the song she filled it with gasping, broken sobs, and then took up the lyric again in a quavering soprano. The tears coursed down her cheeks—not freely, however, for when they came into contact with her heavily beaded eyelashes they assumed an inky color, and pursued the rest of their way in slow black rivulets. A humorous suggestion was made that she sing the notes on her face, whereupon she threw up her hands, sank into a chair, and went off into a deep vinous sleep.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Gatsby Chapter 3 — Your turn (pt. 2)

Ok. Here’s another passage. This one is about Gatsby himself:

He smiled understandingly—much more than understandingly. It was one of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it, that you may come across four or five times in life. It faced—or seemed to face—the whole external world for an instant, and then concentrated on you with an irresistible prejudice in your favor. It understood you just so far as you wanted to be understood, believed in you as you would like to believe in yourself, and assured you that it had precisely the impression of you that, at your best, you hoped to convey. Precisely at that point it vanished—and I was looking at an elegant young rough-neck, a year or two over thirty, whose elaborate formality of speech just missed being absurd. Some time before he introduced himself I’d got a strong impression that he was picking his words with care.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Gatsby, Chapter 3 — Your turn (pt. 1)

Chapter 3 is the culmination of the first 1/3 of the novel (I see the novel split into three three chapter sections).  And it is definitely fancy and flamboyant.  But I’m going to turn the analysis over to you. 

In Chapter 3 we finally meet the mysterious Gatsby whose name gives us our title.  We also are witnesses to quite a raging party through Nick’s eyes.  What I would like you to do is to peer very closely at this party, delve under it’s shiny, gleaming surfaces and discover what’s really going on.  Again, like in previous chapters, he key is in Nick’s words.  Words may sound ugly and mean wonderful things, or, conversely, they may sound lovely and describe the despicable.  We, as alert, able, and active readers must be awake to the truth–the truth in the words.

Please comment what you think is happening in each of the passages from chapter 3 that follows:

Passage 1

There was dancing now on the canvas of the garden, old men pushing young girls backwards in eternal graceless circles, superior couples holding each other tortuously, fashionably and keeping in the corners–and a great number of single girls dancing individualistically or relieving the orchestra for a moment of the burden of the banjo or the traps.  By midnight the hilarity had increased.  A celebrated tenor had sung in Italian and a notorious contralto had sung in jazz and between the numbers people were doing “stunts” all over the garden while happy vacuous bursts of laughter rose toward the summer sky.  A pair of stage “twins”–who turned out to be the girls in yellow–did a baby act in costume and champagne was served in glasses bigger than finger bowls.  The moon had risen higher, and floating in the Sound was a triangle of silver scales, trembling a little to the stiff, tinny drop of the banjoes on the lawn.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Some New York City Geography

New York while physically small is amazingly monstrous in its human geography. Let’s first take a look at Manhattan Island.
...read more

Gatsby Chapter 2, Commentary pt. 3

I’d like to conclude with a comment on the unity of chapter 2.  The whole thing breaks up (including the narrative thread) when a drunken Tom decides that if Myrtle won’t obey, he’ll smash her nose in.  It works pretty well.  She definitely doesn’t petulantly chant “Daisy!” anymore.  But it does kind of ruin the festivities, despite that second bottle of whiskey.  Everyone vacates the premises while various people try to stop the bleeding and Myrtle “trying to spread a copy of ‘Town Tattle’ over the tapestry scenes of Versailles” (37).  It is this tapestry of the gardens of Versailles, I will argue, that ties this whole chapter together. 

...read more

Gatsby, some New York historical background (Terrorism in the ’20s)

Just in case you thought that terrorism was something new or that homegrown terrorists have never before been seen on our shores, well, I thought you might be interested in this. It’s a part of American history we don’t talk about much, but it was still something to consider being a resident of New York in 1920–the most vibrant and dynamic city in the world (as London and Paris were in decline after WWI).

This is an excerpt which appeared in Harper’s (Oct, 2006) ...read more