Scribe: Wed 11.19.2008
Period 4
Today started off with Annie and Brian getting in a fight with each other over a seat. All Mr. Eldridge said, “was it Adam or Eve that got them kicked out of the garden of Eden?” Brian was cheering and Annie was in a worse mood.
* Adam and team Cornbread were making a bunch of wierd hand gestures and flailing their arms.It looked like Adam was throwing food and Sean being his crazy self and surprisingly Eric Henson were snatching the air to grab little pieces of Cheese-Its or Chex Mix. I couldn’t tell.
* So then we started on today’s diciont:
“Once I am sure there’s nothing going on I step inside, letting the door thud shut”- Philip Larkin
Then Eldridge taught us some history about Larkin. He was a poet leaureate which was the top poet in England who worked for the king. Eldridge read us a poem that had the f word (don’t think I’m allowed to type it out) and about parents.
Anyways, the diction was focused on the word thud and its connotations. Then we had to replace the word thud with other verbs such as kicked, yahnked, smacked, clicked. Great stuff. At the end I heard Sean saying his list of words but all I could hear was the ooh sound that every word ended in. I think he used blew and grew. How the heck would a door grow? Maybe if it was wood and it was soaked in water?
* Ed sang that intro song to the Lion King Song (the one with the African voices) and I (tried to) looked it up and found that there was a Lion King 2. WHAT?!!! What other sequels are there for classic Disney movies?
* Then it was Hayley’s turn to talk about Antimetabole which reverses the word order
“Ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country.” -JFK
Antimetabole reverses the words and changes the meaning (but not always)
*Mr. Eldridge asked why politicians use antimetabole. I forget who, but somebody said that it turns the tables on their opponents. Ronald Reagan was a famous president who used antimetabole a lot.
*Michelle had chiasmus, which is similar to antimetabole. As she was starting to read, a group started to whine about not getting their papers yet. Michelle attacked Eldridge for slacking off, which led to several “ooooh”s. Awesome.
Well, chiasmus is the repetition of ideas in inverted order but uses different words. An example: “To stop too fearful, and too faint to go.”
When Michelle ended her presentation, Eldridge asked her why it was important. After thinking about it she cam up with “so you can further learn.”
Eldridge then went to the board to talk about chiasmus and asked someone to read one of the examples. Tristan began to read the first sentence. Then he suddenly said a random sentence which I had no idea where it was on the paper. Mr. Eldridge then drew a diagram on the white board to show us why it was called chiasmus, which had something to do with connecting words with lines. Those lines created a cross which came from some ancient language which means chi (I think).
* Finally, Eldridge ended the day with the explaining the rationale part of the virtue essay, which hasn’t been assigned yet, so calm down you stress-cases, as Eldridge loves to say. He explained that we should go back to the dreaded Bedford Reader to do that part successfully. So all those weekend readings and assignments on definition or analysis weren’t useless after all.
If you’re up reading this and you happen to have Mr. Celestin, it’s good to know that I’m not the only one who didn’t do their Spirits yet. Crap.
Sean’s practiced technique of food consumption, AP style:
- Doesn’t he know that the food’s above him?
- Food! Rawr!
- Hard at work on Diction
Period 5
Scribe Notes Wednesday Nov. 19, 2008
As we have all come to understand by now, today was once again unusual in Mr. Eldridge’s class. Class started with Chris learning that chairs without wheels generally do not roll well on tile. We soon got to work before Mr. E. came in, who proceeded to sit in a chair in the corner surveying the classroom. For some reason, he appeared to be dressed like a sports or Hollywood agent, with a blazer and sunglasses on top of his head. We began deciphering the Diction worksheet, which involved a person entering a room after it was empty and letting the door thud shut. Unfortunately, Zachglasser could not concentrate at all, looking quite forlorn as his eyes nearly filled with tears because Dessouky had not shown up. Suddenly, his face lit up like a small child as the door opened and Dessouky slyly hid his face with his hood in order to prevent detection from Mr. Eldridge. After Dessouky wandered around the class a couple times, we got back to work, when Erica told us that her “G-Ma makes some dank jelly!” After some more craziness, Shaina Denny! gave her trope on Apposition, with a vibrant purple apposition watermark on her paper that matched her clothes. Mr. E. asked her if she was related to Ben Stein (Bueller, Bueller, Bueller…) due to the great inflection of her voice. We got back to the diction worksheet, where I demonstrated to the class the difference between a thud and a slam by pounding on my desk with a fist and an open palm. The class contributed some awesome verbs to the action of shutting a door—among my favorites were head-butted, kicked, and trickled (perhaps the door became so hot it melted into a puddle?)
Some more hand gestures and odd sounds followed before Mr. E. motivated us by calling us the “weird 10%” of the school because we’re in AP. Then, we once again went over the dreaded Lady Montagu and her despicableness for writing such a complex letter. Mr. E. reinforced the importance of reading the prompt and understanding its requirements. He explained that 95% of the time the passage’s views will be logical, because most passages don’t argue that women should stay home and do housework or that racism is a positive part of society, unless the AP authoritarians feel like giving us a satire to screw with our heads or because they’re really racist.
One more task down, and to the virtue essay we went. Mr. E. was astounded by Dessouky’s outstanding memory that allowed him to remember the whole packet without even looking at it, and Mr. Eldridge also decided to clarify the difference between pre-writing and post-writing. After asking several questions to help us understand the essay better and getting little feedback, Mr. E. turned to the Gumdrops of Doom, who had trouble answering the questions and became labeled as the “Space Cadets.” He asked how many rhetorical modes we needed, and I foolishly said at least 1 (I didn’t realize this was obvious since the answer couldn’t have been 0) and the class settled on 1 or 2. Mr. E. was midsentence when the bell rang and everyone scampered off the door. Another adventure down, another one awaits tomorrow.
-Alex “The Kolkin” Kolkin
Filed under: Daily Scribe and tagged Antimetabole, apposition, Ben Stein, chiasmus, Diction, Ed Guo making trouble, Lady Montagu, Sean acting crazy, Space Cadets, What is Tristan doing?, Zachglasser



On the Virtue Essay, step 3 with the questions and all, it says, “every vice must be limited or it will turn into a vice.” So, too much compassion is a bad thing. Too much compassion could become overwhelming I suppose. Well, if you’re too humble then that could be bad, you wouldn’t have any face. But that’s kind of how they act in China, very, very humble.
I just finished reading this book, “American Shaolin: Flying Kicks, Buddhist Monks, and the Legend of Iron Crotch: An Odyssey in the New China” –very interesting by the way– but the Chinese were always dismissing compliments and I guess that could be a vice if not everyone else did that, then you would come off as insecure.
So, I was before wondering how every virtue could eventually become a vice, but now after putting some thought into it, if you think about it you can make a vice out of any of the virtues if you come up with the right scenario.
[Reply to comment]
so i would like to apologize to the class for my terrible public speaking abilities haha. michelle, we got through it! on the first day of class when i was left picking antimetabole because all of the other tropes were gone, i was terrified because i had absolutely no idea what it was, but in the end, i actually kind of found it interesting. and i like how it ties into a chiasmus. i didn’t realize that i have heard them in so many famous speeches and didn’t realize what their purpose was and why they were were so powerful!…but guess what!? its because the the phrase or clause is replicated at the end of the sentence to change the meaning of what was first stated.
have a good night!
-hayley
[Reply to comment]
whoops i forgot to write my name
[Reply to comment]
oh yeah
on the disney thing
I can’t believe they had a cinderella 3
WHAT?!
anyways I just realized that castle and the door make a d shapeif you turn it. Oh and the crazy g-looking scribble is actually a D. Wow
[Reply to comment]
andrew u will be shocked to hear about all the sequels for disney movies such as
+the lion king 2
+the lion king 1 1/2
+the little mermaid 2
+the little mermaid 3 – Ariel’s beginning
+ brother bear 2
+ bambi 2
+ the fox and the hound 2
+ lilo and stitch 2
i dont feel like writing the rest so for a complete list:
http://www.disneymovieslist.com/animated-disney-movies.asp
unfortunatly the sequels that i have seen are absolutely horrible!!
[Reply to comment]
i agree with andrea the sequels are HORRIBLE none of them beat the originals…. my personal disney favorite is cinderella
[Reply to comment]
Whoa whoa, calm down with the generalizations there, andrea and gellan. Although I agree the originals tend to be much better, The Lion King 1 1/2 was by no means horrible.
[Reply to comment]
haha i personally didnt like lion king 1 1/2. sure the “jacuzzi” scene wit timon, pumbaa and simba was funny it was still gross. not the best example for little kids might i add
[Reply to comment]
well its okay.
i had to do my trope in like
2 minutes
so i had to speed talk like mad, and i dont think anyone understood what i was saying.
but luckily it was an easy trope that everyone already knew. haha..
[Reply to comment]
What the heck is a 1 1/2?
is it the original with half of it being new?
worst idea ever and it probably did suck
[Reply to comment]
Jeeze Andrew don’t judge a book by it’s cover.
Actually, Lion King 1 1/2 is the original Lion King story shown/told from Timone and Pumba’s point of view. It doesn’t really beat the original but it’s probably funnier.
[Reply to comment]
Oh and by the way, this excerpt from the Lion King is the best scene from any movie, ever:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkWs3HVww4I
[Reply to comment]
kieth lion kind 1 1/2 is good…. i actually have it…but its still doesn’t beat the original (timon and pumba are hilarious though)
[Reply to comment]
In my opinion, Disney should never do sequels. It completely kills the movie and i personally don’t want to watch it (and sometimes the original too) ever again. I can’t think of a disney sequel that actually came out in theatres, further proving that they all are bad.
I have one exception though, any movie done by PIXAR is pure genius. Their sequels are different…dare i say funny?
[Reply to comment]
Tera-Lynne, I somewhat agree too. For example National Treasure was completely ruined by the second one (and now I hear there’s a third). And Keith, that scene was hilarious but it’s not the best:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Xj08-_Rmq4
[Reply to comment]
I agree with you both. And great example Alex. Pretty much the only exceptions i can think of are Toy Story 2, Spider-Man 2, and the Dark Knight.
The problem with sequels is that everything is so familiar, unless you completely change things it just feels like you’ve been there already. And you start to like the characters less.
[Reply to comment]
hmmm touche, Carfi, I forgot about that one
I think the Lion King one is funnier but it’s hard to tell which one’s better overall
[Reply to comment]
You know what else I can’t stand? In sequels when there is a major discrepancy of facts between the original and the second movies. Take, for example, Beauty and the Beast. During the end of the first one, the Beast gets transformed back into a human, right? Then in the second one, he’s a beast again? What is up with that? So annoying.
[Reply to comment]